Jump to Main Content
Genomic selection prediction accuracy in a perennial crop: case study of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)
- Cros, David, Denis, Marie, Sánchez, Leopoldo, Cochard, Benoit, Flori, Albert, Durand-Gasselin, Tristan, Nouy, Bruno, Omoré, Alphonse, Pomiès, Virginie, Riou, Virginie, Suryana, Edyana, Bouvet, Jean-Marc
- Theoretical and applied genetics 2015 v.128 no.3 pp. 397-410
- Elaeis guineensis, breeding value, case studies, correlation, crops, fruit pulp, genetic improvement, marker-assisted selection, microsatellite repeats, oils, prediction, progeny, recurrent selection, selection intensity
- KEY MESSAGE : Genomic selection empirically appeared valuable for reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm as it could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms, despite small populations and low marker density. Genomic selection (GS) can increase the genetic gain in plants. In perennial crops, this is expected mainly through shortened breeding cycles and increased selection intensity, which requires sufficient GS accuracy in selection candidates, despite often small training populations. Our objective was to obtain the first empirical estimate of GS accuracy in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), the major world oil crop. We used two parental populations involved in conventional reciprocal recurrent selection (Deli and Group B) with 131 individuals each, genotyped with 265 SSR. We estimated within-population GS accuracies when predicting breeding values of non-progeny-tested individuals for eight yield traits. We used three methods to sample training sets and five statistical methods to estimate genomic breeding values. The results showed that GS could account for family effects and Mendelian sampling terms in Group B but only for family effects in Deli. Presumably, this difference between populations originated from their contrasting breeding history. The GS accuracy ranged from −0.41 to 0.94 and was positively correlated with the relationship between training and test sets. Training sets optimized with the so-called CDmean criterion gave the highest accuracies, ranging from 0.49 (pulp to fruit ratio in Group B) to 0.94 (fruit weight in Group B). The statistical methods did not affect the accuracy. Finally, Group B could be preselected for progeny tests by applying GS to key yield traits, therefore increasing the selection intensity. Our results should be valuable for breeding programs with small populations, long breeding cycles, or reduced effective size.