Jump to Main Content
Efficiency of nitrification inhibitor DMPP to reduce nitrous oxide emissions under different temperature and moisture conditions
- MenÃ©ndez, Sergio, Barrena, Iskander, Setien, Igor, GonzÃ¡lez-Murua, Carmen, Estavillo, JosÃ© MarÃa
- Soil biology & biochemistry 2012 v.53 pp. 82-89
- carbon dioxide, soil water content, nitrogen, microbial activity, nitrification, methane, environmental factors, global warming, nitrification inhibitors, phosphates, water temperature, emissions, denitrification, ammonium nitrate, adverse effects, nitrous oxide, nitrogen fertilizers
- Agricultural intensification has led to the use of very high inputs of nitrogen fertilizers into cultivated land. As a consequence of this, nitrous oxide (NâO) emissions have increased significantly. Nowadays, the challenge is to mitigate these emissions in order to reduce global warming. Addition of nitrification inhibitors (NI) to fertilizers can reduce the losses of NâO to the atmosphere, but field studies have shown that their efficiency varies depending greatly on the environmental conditions. Soil water content and temperature are key factors controlling NâO emissions from soils and they seem to be also key parameters responsible for the variation in nitrification inhibitors efficiency. We present a laboratory study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazol phosphate (DMPP) at three different temperatures (10, 15 and 20Â Â°C) and three soil water contents (40%, 60% and 80% of WFPS) on NâO emissions following the application of 1.2Â mgÂ NÂ kgâ»Â¹ dry soil (equivalent to 140Â kgÂ NÂ haâ»Â¹). Also the COâ and CHâ emissions were followed to see the possible side effects of DMPP on the overall microbial activities. Nitrogen was applied either as ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN) or as ENTEC 26 (ASNÂ +Â DMPP). The application of ENTEC 26 was effective reducing NâO losses up to the levels of an unfertilized control treatment in all conditions. Nevertheless, the percentage of reduction induced by DMPP in the ENTEC treatment with respect to the ASN varied from 3% to 45% depending on temperature and soil water content conditions. At 40% of WFPS, when nitrification is expected to be the main process producing NâO, the increase of NâO emissions in ASN together with temperature provoked an increase in DMPP efficiency reducing these emissions from 17% up to 42%. Contrarily, at 80% of WFPS, when denitrification is expected to be the main source of NâO, emissions after ASN application decreased with temperature, which induced a decrease from 45% to 23% in the efficiency of DMPP reducing NâO losses. Overall, the results obtained in this study suggest that DMPP performance regarding NâO emissions reduction would be the best in cold and wet conditions. Neither COâ emissions nor CHâ emissions were affected by the use of DMPP at the different soil water contents and temperatures.