Jump to Main Content
Distribution, body length, and abundance of blue shark and shortfin mako offshore of northeastern Japan, as determined from observed pelagic longline data, 2000–2014
- Ohshimo, Seiji, Fujinami, Yuki, Shiozaki, Ko, Kai, Mikihiko, Semba, Yasuko, Katsumata, Nobuhiro, Ochi, Daisuke, Matsunaga, Hiroaki, Minami, Hiroshi, Kiyota, Masashi, Yokawa, Kotaro
- Fisheries oceanography 2016 v.25 no.3 pp. 259-276
- Isurus oxyrinchus, Prionace glauca, body length, juveniles, linear models, sharks, surface temperature, surveys, Japan, Pacific Ocean
- Longline surveys have been conducted in the Northwest Pacific Ocean from 2000 to 2014 using chartered commercial longline vessels. Each year, two cruises were conducted offshore of northeastern Japan from mid‐April to mid‐June. For each longline set during the surveys, onboard scientists collected detailed biological information about the species caught, such as the size and sex, and recorded the catch numbers for all species. Blue shark (Prionace glauca) and shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) have eurythermal distributions, but the application of a generalized additive model (GAM) showed that the sea surface temperatures (SSTs) at catch sites positive for shortfin mako were warmer than those for blue shark. On the basis of the GAM, the probabilities of occurrence of both sharks differed by size category: small sharks had a narrower SST range than that of large sharks. Most catches of both sharks were juveniles, and the nominal catch rate of blue shark was more than 10 times that of shortfin mako. The standardized catch per unit effort (CPUE) for both species was calculated using a generalized linear model (GLM) with negative binomial errors, or a delta‐lognormal GLM. The standardized CPUE for blue shark in the second quarter of the year peaked in the mid‐2000s and then decreased, but it has been increasing since 2012. The CPUE for shortfin mako in the second quarter generally increased, with fluctuations.