Jump to Main Content
Thinking outside of the lake: Can controls on nutrient inputs into Lake Erie benefit stream conservation in its watershed?
- Keitzer, S. Conor, Ludsin, Stuart A., Sowa, Scott P., Annis, Gust, Arnold, Jeff G., Daggupati, Prasad, Froehlich, August M., Herbert, Matt E., Johnson, Mari-Vaughn V., Sasson, Anthony M., Yen, Haw, White, Mike J., Rewa, Charles A.
- Journal of Great Lakes research 2016 v.42 no.6 pp. 1322-1331
- basins, biological models, conservation practices, ecosystems, eutrophication, farms, fish communities, habitats, lakes, nutrient management, phosphorus, spring, streams, summer, technology, water quality, watershed hydrology, watersheds, Lake Erie
- Investment in agricultural conservation practices (CPs) to address Lake Erie's re-eutrophication may offer benefits that extend beyond the lake, such as improved habitat conditions for fish communities throughout the watershed. If such conditions are not explicitly considered in Lake Erie nutrient management strategies, however, this opportunity might be missed. Herein, we quantify the potential for common CPs that will be used to meet nutrient management goals for Lake Erie to simultaneously improve stream biological conditions throughout the western Lake Erie basin (WLEB) watershed. To do so, we linked a high-resolution watershed-hydrology model to predictive biological models in a conservation scenario framework. Our modeling simulations showed that the implementation of CPs on farm acres in critical and moderate need of treatment, representing nearly half of the watershed, would be needed to reduce spring/early summer total phosphorus loads from the WLEB watershed to acceptable levels. This widespread CP implementation also would improve potential stream biological conditions in >11,000km of streams and reduce the percentage of streams where water quality is limiting biological conditions, from 31% to 20%. Despite these improvements, we found that even with additional treatment of acres in low need of CPs, degraded water quality conditions would limit biological conditions in >3200streamkm. Thus, while we expect CPs to play an important role in mitigating eutrophication problems in the Lake Erie ecosystem, additional strategies and emerging technologies appear necessary to fully reduce water quality limitation throughout the watershed.