Jump to Main Content
Interlaboratory Comparison of Real-Time PCR Protocols for Quantification of General Fecal Indicator Bacteria
- Shanks, Orin C., Sivaganesan, Mano, Peed, Lindsay, Kelty, Catherine
A., Blackwood, A. Denene, Greene, Monica R., Noble, Rachel T., Bushon, Rebecca N., Stelzer, Erin A., Kinzelman, Julie, Anan’eva, Tamara, Sinigalliano, Christopher, Wanless, David, Griffith, John, Cao, Yiping, Weisberg, Steve, Harwood, Valarie J., Staley, Christopher, Oshima, Kevin H., Varma, Manju, Haugland, Richard A.
- Environmental Science & Technology 2012 v.46 no.2 pp. 945-953
- Bacteroidales, DNA, Enterococcus, bacteria, indicator species, pathogen identification, quantitative analysis, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, reliability, reproducibility, research facilities, standard operating procedures, water microbiology, water pollution, water quality, United States
- The application of quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) technologies for the rapid identification of fecal bacteria in environmental waters is being considered for use as a national water quality metric in the United States. The transition from research tool to a standardized protocol requires information on the reproducibility and sources of variation associated with qPCR methodology across laboratories. This study examines interlaboratory variability in the measurement of enterococci and Bacteroidales concentrations from standardized, spiked, and environmental sources of DNA using the Entero1a and GenBac3 qPCR methods, respectively. Comparisons are based on data generated from eight different research facilities. Special attention was placed on the influence of the DNA isolation step and effect of simplex and multiplex amplification approaches on interlaboratory variability. Results suggest that a crude lysate is sufficient for DNA isolation unless environmental samples contain substances that can inhibit qPCR amplification. No appreciable difference was observed between simplex and multiplex amplification approaches. Overall, interlaboratory variability levels remained low (<10% coefficient of variation) regardless of qPCR protocol.