Main content area

First Report of Pseudomonas viridiflava Causing a Bacterial Blight of Artichoke Bract Leaves

Sarris, P. F., Trantas, E. A., Mpalantinaki, E., Ververidis, F. N., Gouma, S. E., Goumas, D. E.
Plant disease 2012 v.96 no.8 pp. 1223
Chrysanthemum indicum, Cynara cardunculus subsp. cardunculus, Pseudomonas viridiflava, agar, arginine deiminase, artichokes, blight, bracts, dipping, eggplants, fluorescence, genes, genetic databases, hypersensitive response, lactic acid, leaves, levan, microbial culture, multilocus sequence typing, necrosis, nucleotide sequences, pathogenicity, phylogeny, pith, potatoes, relative humidity, stems, sucrose, tobacco, tomatoes, trigonelline, wilting, Crete, Greece
In 2006, a disease was observed on two artichoke (Cynara scolymus L. cv. Lardati) fields in Crete, Greece, covering ~2 ha. Symptoms developed after several days of rainy and windy weather and >70% of capitula were affected, resulting in unmarketable produce. Initial symptoms were water-soaked, dark green spots on bracts with many sunken, necrotic, often elongated lesions, each with a brown-black center and surrounded by a water-soaked halo with a dark red-brown margin. Symptoms were more severe on inner bracts. Isolations from symptomatic, surface-disinfected bracts onto King's B agar medium (KB) consistently yielded yellow bacterial colonies that produced a green-blue fluorescent pigment. Ten selected artichoke isolates, all gram-negative, presented the LOPAT profile (- - + - +) and were levan negative, oxidase negative, potato rot positive, arginine dihydrolase negative, and showed tobacco hypersensitive reaction. All isolates used L-arabinose, D(-)-tartrate, and L-lactate, but not sucrose, L(+)-tartrate, or trigonelline. Results were identical to those obtained with the reference strain of Pseudomonas viridiflava NCPPB 1249 (3), and strains PV3005 and PV3006 from eggplant (1). Based on these biochemical tests, 10 isolates were identified as P. viridiflava group II members of the LOPAT determinative scheme of Lelliott (1,2). Two artichoke isolates (PV608 and PV609) were selected for molecular characterization. The identity and phylogenetic analysis were determined by multilocus sequence typing with the gyrB, rpoD, and rpoB genes (PV608 Accession Nos. JN383375, JN383363, and JQ267546; PV609 Accession Nos. JN383376, JN383364, and JQ267547). BLAST searches showed highest nucleotide sequence identity (96%) with GenBank sequences of P. viridiflava reference strains NCPPB 963 and CFBP 2107. Pathogenicity of 10 artichoke isolates and reference strains was tested twice on detached capitulum bracts of artichoke cv. Lardati, as well as 4-week-old tomato plants of cv. ACE, and Chrysanthemum indicum cv. Reagan plants. Each isolate was inoculated onto 10 bracts by placing 15 μl of bacterial suspension (5 × 10⁶ CFU/ml) of a 48-h culture in KB broth on the surface of the bract, and pricking the bract through the drop of bacterial suspension with a sterile needle. Each isolate was also inoculated onto five tomato and five chrysanthemum plants by dipping a sterile toothpick in the appropriate bacterial culture and pricking the surface of the stem. Ten control plants were inoculated similarly with sterile, distilled water. Inoculated bracts and plants were kept in boxes lined with moist filter paper at 25 to 30°C and 80 to 100% relative humidity. Lesions developed on detached bracts within 72 h and were similar to those observed on the naturally infected plants. On tomato and chrysanthemum plants, pith necrosis and wilting symptoms were induced within 1 week of inoculation. Symptoms were not observed on control bracts and plants. Bacterial colonies were reisolated from bract lesions and stems with pith necrosis, but not from control plants, and the reisolates had the same LOPAT profile as the original isolates of P. viridiflava, thus fulfilling Koch's postulates. To our knowledge, this is the first report in the world of P. viridiflava causing a disease of artichoke bracts.References: (1) D. E. Goumas et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 104:181, 1998. (2) Lelliott et al. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 29:470, 1966. (3) M. L. Saunier et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2360, 1996.