PubAg

Main content area

Aromatic C–F Hydroxylation by Nonheme Iron(IV)–Oxo Complexes: Structural, Spectroscopic, and Mechanistic Investigations

Author:
Sahu, Sumit, Zhang, Bo, Pollock, Christopher J., Dürr, Maximilian, Davies, Casey G., Confer, Alex M., Ivanović-Burmazović, Ivana, Siegler, Maxime A., Jameson, Guy N. L., Krebs, Carsten, Goldberg, David P.
Source:
Journal of the American Chemical Society 2016 v.138 no.39 pp. 12791-12802
ISSN:
1520-5126
Subject:
X-ray diffraction, acetonitrile, crystal structure, hydroxylation, iron, ligands, spectroscopy, temperature
Abstract:
The synthesis and reactivity of a series of mononuclear nonheme iron complexes that carry out intramolecular aromatic C–F hydroxylation reactions is reported. The key intermediate prior to C–F hydroxylation, [Feᴵⱽ(O)(N4Py²ᴬʳ¹)](BF₄)₂ (1-O, Ar₁ = −2,6-difluorophenyl), was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The crystal structure revealed a nonbonding C–H···OFe interaction with a CH₃CN molecule. Variable-field Mössbauer spectroscopy of 1-O indicates an intermediate-spin (S = 1) ground state. The Mössbauer parameters for 1-O include an unusually small quadrupole splitting for a triplet Feᴵⱽ(O) and are reproduced well by density functional theory calculations. With the aim of investigating the initial step for C–F hydroxylation, two new ligands were synthesized, N4Py²ᴬʳ² (L2, Ar₂ = −2,6-difluoro-4-methoxyphenyl) and N4Py²ᴬʳ³ (L3, Ar₃ = −2,6-difluoro-3-methoxyphenyl), with −OMe substituents in the meta or ortho/para positions with respect to the C–F bonds. Feᴵᴵ complexes [Fe(N4Py²ᴬʳ²)(CH₃CN)](ClO₄)₂ (2) and [Fe(N4Py²ᴬʳ³)(CH₃CN)](ClO₄)₂ (3) reacted with isopropyl 2-iodoxybenzoate to give the C–F hydroxylated Feᴵᴵᴵ–OAr products. The Feᴵⱽ(O) intermediates 2-O and 3-O were trapped at low temperature and characterized. Complex 2-O displayed a C–F hydroxylation rate similar to that of 1-O. In contrast, the kinetics (via stopped-flow UV–vis) for complex 3-O displayed a significant rate enhancement for C–F hydroxylation. Eyring analysis revealed the activation barriers for the C–F hydroxylation reaction for the three complexes, consistent with the observed difference in reactivity. A terminal Feᴵᴵ(OH) complex (4) was prepared independently to investigate the possibility of a nucleophilic aromatic substitution pathway, but the stability of 4 rules out this mechanism. Taken together the data fully support an electrophilic C–F hydroxylation mechanism.
Agid:
5560513