PubAg

Main content area

Surface soil water content spatial organization within irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural fields

Author:
Cosh, Michael H., Evett, Steven R., McKee, Lynn
Source:
Advances in Water Resources 2012 v.50 pp. 55
ISSN:
0309-1708
Subject:
Gossypium hirsutum, cotton, evapotranspiration, irrigated farming, irrigated soils, irrigation, land management, models, monitoring, remote sensing, row spacing, sensors (equipment), soil water content, surface water
Abstract:
Understanding soil water content, θ, variability is important for monitoring and modeling of land surface processes as well as land and water management practices. With regards to in situ θ probes, it is sometimes assumed that a single local measurement can represent the larger domain, mostly for practical reasons. But there is a substantial amount of variability in θ at the field scale. As part of the Bushland Evapotranspiration and Agricultural Remote Sensing Experiment 2008 (BEAREX08), a high-density sensor network and intensive observational periods were developed to fully describe the θ conditions at the surface on the field scale, in support of the hydro-meteorological measurements being collected. A total of 20 θ stations were distributed over an irrigated and a non-irrigated field (~10 ha each) and high-density (~every 5 cm) transects were measured for a high-detailed record. The network was able to provide large scale estimates of θ with an accuracy (root mean square error, RMSE) of 0.035 m3/m3. The network was temporally stable with the exception being immediately during and after irrigation events. Irrigation caused significant increases in coefficients of variation due to the length of time (8–12 h) necessary to irrigate the entire field. The spatial distribution of surface θ was significantly affected by the row structure of the cotton plants, which was North–South in the field where transect measurements were made with a row spacing of 76 cm. At scales <35 cm (approximately half the row spacing), the distribution was correlated in the East–West direction. For scales larger than 35 cm in the East–West direction the correlation decreased, but was still present. In the North–South direction this discontinuity was not present, and θ followed a power law distribution.
Handle:
10113/56313