PubAg

Main content area

The value of virtual conferencing for ecology and conservation

Author:
Fraser, Hannah, Soanes, Kylie, Jones, Stuart A., Jones, Chris S., Malishev, Matthew
Source:
Conservation biology 2017 v.31 no.3 pp. 540-546
ISSN:
0888-8892
Subject:
biodiversity, carbon, carbon footprint, culture and humanities, developed countries, developing countries, education, emissions, models, planning, scientists, streams
Abstract:
The objectives of conservation science and dissemination of its research create a paradox: Conservation is about preserving the environment, yet scientists spread this message at conferences with heavy carbon footprints. Ecology and conservation science depend on global knowledge exchange—getting the best science to the places it is most needed. However, conference attendance from developed countries typically outweighs that from developing countries that are biodiversity and conservation hotspots. If any branch of science should be trying to maximize participation while minimizing carbon emissions, it is conservation. Virtual conferencing is common in other disciplines, such as education and humanities, but it is surprisingly underused in ecology and conservation. Adopting virtual conferencing entails a number of challenges, including logistics and unified acceptance, which we argue can be overcome through planning and technology. We examined 4 conference models: a pure‐virtual model and 3 hybrid hub‐and‐node models, where hubs stream content to local nodes. These models collectively aim to mitigate the logistical and administrative challenges of global knowledge transfer. Embracing virtual conferencing addresses 2 essential prerequisites of modern conferences: lowering carbon emissions and increasing accessibility for remote, time‐ and resource‐poor researchers, particularly those from developing countries.
Agid:
5719792