PubAg

Main content area

On-farm trial on the effectiveness of the nitrification inhibitor DMPP indicates no benefits under commercial Australian farming practices

Author:
Nauer, Philipp A., Fest, Benedikt J., Visser, Luke, Arndt, Stefan K.
Source:
Agriculture, ecosystems & environment 2018 v.253 pp. 82-89
ISSN:
0167-8809
Subject:
dairy farming, environmental impact, farmers, farming systems, fertilizer rates, field experimentation, greenhouse gas emissions, greenhouse gases, growing season, industry, nitrification inhibitors, nitrogen, nitrogen fertilizers, nitrous oxide, on-farm research, pastures, phosphates, soil water, urea, winter, Australia
Abstract:
The trend of increasing nitrogen (N) fertilisation in commercial agriculture demands mitigation of negative impacts on the environment, such as emissions of the potent greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). Laboratory and controlled field experiments have demonstrated that the nitrification inhibitor 3,4-Dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) has the potential to effectively mitigate N2O emissions from dairy pasture and crop farming, and may increase yields. Yet, this has not been investigated in on-farm research trials under commercial production conditions. During the winter growing seasons 2014–2016 we performed an on-farm trial on five commercial broad-acre cropping and five dairy farms in North-East Victoria, Australia, to compare the performance of DMPP+urea (treatment) against conventional urea (control) fertiliser in mitigating N2O emissions and increasing crop and pasture yields. Application rate was fixed at the regional industry standard of 46kgNha‐1, yet timing, number of applications and all other management decisions were left to the judgement of the participating farmers. Emissions of N2O were highly variable over time and between farms. We recorded emission spikes of up to 250gN2O-Nha−1d−1, but 90% of measurements ranged between 1.0–62gN2O-Nha−1d−1. Thus, N2O emissions were dominated by peak fluxes and correlated with soil moisture and the time since fertiliser application. However, there was no significant difference between N2O emissions from DMPP-treated and control plots in all three seasons. Similarly, crop and pasture yield did not differ significantly between treatment and control. It is likely that the high N application rate was responsible for the poor performance of DMPP under commercial production conditions. Consequently, simply replacing conventional fertiliser with a DMPP-containing product cannot be recommended. Any commercial application of DMPP will need to be accompanied by changes in fertiliser management, of which reducing the N application rate appears most promising.
Agid:
5847505