Jump to Main Content
Gallocatechin biosynthesis via a flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase is a defense response in Norway spruce against infection by the bark beetle-associated sap-staining fungus Endoconidiophora polonica
- Hammerbacher, Almuth, Raguschke, Bettina, Wright, Louwrance P., Gershenzon, Jonathan
- Phytochemistry 2018 v.148 pp. 78-86
- Nicotiana benthamiana, Picea abies, bark, bioactive properties, biosynthesis, catechin, epigallocatechin, fungi, genes, heterologous gene expression, melanin, microbial growth, polymers, proanthocyanidins, wood
- One of the best-studied defense responses to fungal infection in Norway spruce (Picea abies) is the biosynthesis of flavan-3-ols, which accumulate as monomers or polymers known as proanthocyanidins. The individual flavan-3-ol units consist of compounds with a 3′,4′-dihydroxylated B ring [2,3-(trans)-(+)-catechin or 2,3-(cis)-(−)-epicatechin] and compounds with a 3′,4′,5′-trihydroxylated B ring [2,3 (trans)-(+)-gallocatechin or 2,3-(cis)-(−)-epigallocatechin].While much is known about the biosynthesis and biological activity of catechin in Norway spruce, there is little comparable information about gallocatechin or epigallocatechin. We found that there was a significant increase in the gallocatechin content of Norway spruce bark and wood after inoculation with the bark beetle-associated sap-staining fungus Endoconidiophora polonica. Gallocatechins increased proportionally more than catechins as both monomers and units of polymers. A flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase gene identified in Norway spruce was shown by heterologous expression in Nicotiana benthamiana to be involved in the conversion of 2,3 (trans)-(+)-catechin to 2,3 (trans)-(+)-gallocatechin. The formation of the trihydroxylated B ring in Norway spruce occurs at the level of flavan-3-ols, rather than at the level of dihydroflavonols as in many angiosperms. The transcript abundance of the flavonoid 3′,5′-hydroxylase gene also increased significantly during fungal infection underlining its importance in gallocatechin biosynthesis. Comparisons of the effect of 2,3 (trans)-(+)-catechin and 2,3 (trans)-(+)-gallocatechin on fungal growth revealed that 2,3 (trans)-(+)-catechin is a stronger inhibitor of fungal growth, while 2,3 (trans)-(+)-gallocatechin is a stronger inhibitor of melanin biosynthesis.