U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government


Main content area

Second Stage Lint Cleaning System PM10 Emission Factors and Rates for Cotton Gins: Method 201A PM10 Sizing Cyclones

Whitelock, Derek P., Buser, Michael D., Boykin, J. Clif, Holt, Gregory A.
Journal of cotton science 2014 v.18 no.2 pp. 237-247
cyclone separators, lint cotton, industry, data collection, emissions factor, particulates, particulate emissions, air flow, cleaning, agricultural machinery and equipment
This report is part of a project to characterize cotton gin emissions from the standpoint of stack sampling. The impetus behind this project was the urgent need to collect cotton gin emissions data to address current regulatory issues. A key component of this study was focused on Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) emission factors for particulate matter with a particle diameter nominally less than or equal to 10 μm (PM10). The 1996 EPA AP-42 emission factors were assigned quality ratings, from A (Excellent) to E (Poor), to assess the quality of the data being referenced. Emission factor quality ratings for cotton gins were extremely low. Also, some commonly used cotton gin systems were not represented or were combined with another system under a single emission factor in AP-42. There were no 1996 EPA AP-42 emission factors published for 2nd stage lint cleaning systems. The objective of this study was to collect PM10 emission factor data for 2nd stage lint cleaning systems at cotton gins located in regions across the cotton belt based on EPA-approved stack sampling methodology, Method 201A. The project plan included sampling seven cotton gins across the cotton belt. Key factors for selecting specific cotton gins included: 1) facility location, 2) production capacity, 3) processing systems and 4) abatement technologies. Four of the seven gins were equipped with 2nd stage lint cleaning systems where the exhaust airstreams were not combined with the 1st stage lint cleaning systems. In terms of capacity, the four gins weretypical of the industry, averaging 29.4 bales/h during testing. Some test runs were excluded from the test averages because they failed to meet EPA Method 201A test criteria. Also, other test runs, included in the analyses, had cotton lint fibers that collected in the ≤ 10 μm samples. This larger lint material can affect the reported emissions data, but EPA Method 201A does not suggest methods to account for these anomalies. The 2nd stage lint cleaning system average emission factors for PM10 and total particulate were 0.018 kg/227-kg bale (0.039 lb/500-lb bale) and 0.035 kg/bale (0.078 lb/ bale), respectively. System average PM10 and total particulate emission factors were lower than those currently published in EPA AP-42 for 1st and 2nd stage lint cleaning systems combined. The 2nd stage lint cleaning system PM10 emission rate test averages ranged from 0.15 to 0.98 kg/h (0.33-2.17 lb/h). The ratio of 2nd stage lint cleaning system PM10 to total particulate was 50.5%.