Jump to Main Content
Olive response to potassium applications under different water regimes and cultivars
- Ferreira, Isabel Q., Arrobas, Margarida, Moutinho-Pereira, José, Correia, Carlos, Rodrigues, M. Ângelo
- Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 2018 v.112 no.3 pp. 387-401
- Olea europaea, chlorophyll, crop yield, cultivars, farmers, fertilizer rates, field experimentation, fluorescence, leaves, olives, phytomass, potassium, potassium fertilizers, roots, shoots, soil, tree growth, water stress
- Although potassium (K) is a macronutrient few studies have evaluated the response of olive tree to K fertilization. In this work results of two field and two pot K fertilizer experiments are presented. One of the field trials was conducted in a commercial young olive grove. The second was conducted in a plantation purposely established for this study. In the two field and the first pot experiment, the K supply was the single variation factor. The second pot experiment was arranged as a factorial with two K rates, two water regimes and two cultivars (‘Arbequina’ and ‘Cobrançosa’). K supply did not increase olive tree growth or yield. Accumulated olive yield in the first field experiment, for instance, varied from 2.46 and 2.84 kg tree⁻¹, respectively in K treated and untreated plants. K supply increased the shoot/root ratio (1.6–2.0 from the control to the most fertilized treatment) and the concentration of K in roots (2.9–11.2 g kg⁻¹) to a greater extent than in leaves (7.0–11.9 g kg⁻¹), suggesting that shoots are a priority sink for K and roots may store the nutrient as a reserve. Plant water status and chlorophyll a fluorescence were not significantly affected by K applications. Plants suffering from water stress yielded less phytomass (40.2–56.4 g pot⁻¹, respectively in control and well-watered plants) and showed higher K concentrations in leaves (14.2–11.6 g kg⁻¹) and lower in roots (4.9–6.8 g kg⁻¹) which is probably due to the reduction of K uptake from the dry soil. ‘Cobrançosa’ appeared to be more tolerant to water stress than ‘Arbequina’. These experiments showed a poor response of olive tree to K fertilization. Considering that K is usually applied by farmers every year, it seems that further studies on K fertilization in olive are needed in order to adjust K fertilizer rates to crop needs.