U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.


Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Main content area

Effects of chicken interferon Gamma on Newcastle disease virus vaccine immunogenicity

Stivalis Cardenas-Garcia, Robert P. Dunwoody, Valerie Marcano, Diego G. Diel, Robert J. Williams, Robert M. Gogal Jr., Corrie C. Brown, Patti J. Miller, Claudio L. Afonso
Plos One 2016 v.11 no.7 pp. e0159153
chickens, memory, antigens, interferon-gamma, antibodies, morbidity, live vaccines, cytokines, secondary immunization, vaccination, Avian orthoavulavirus 1, viruses, genes, immune response, bird diseases, recombinant vaccines, virulence, mortality, juveniles
More effective vaccines are needed to control avian diseases. The use of chicken interferon gamma (chIFN') during vaccination is a potentially important but controversial approach that may improve the immune response to antigens. In the present study, three different systems to co-deliver chIFN' with Newcastle disease virus (NDV) antigens were evaluated for their ability to enhance the avian immune response and their protective capacity upon challenge with virulent NDV. These systems consisted of: 1) a DNA vaccine expressing the Newcastle disease virus fusion (F) protein co-administered with a vector expressing the chIFN' gene for in ovo and booster vaccination, 2) a recombinant Newcastle disease virus expressing the chIFN' gene rZJ1*L/IFN') used as a live vaccine delivered in ovo and into juvenile chickens, and 3) the same rZJ1*L/IFN' virus used as an inactivated vaccine for juvenile chickens. Co-administration of chIFN' with a DNA vaccine expressing the F protein resulted in higher levels of morbidity and mortality, and higher amounts of virulent virus shed after challenge when compared to the group that did not receive chIFN'. The live vaccine system co-delivering chIFN' did not enhanced post-vaccination antibody response, nor improved survival after hatch, when administered in ovo, and did not affect survival after challenge when administered to juvenile chickens. The low dose of the inactivated vaccine co-delivering active chIFN' induced lower antibody titers than the groups that did not receive the cytokine. The high dose of this vaccine did not increase the antibody titers or antigen-specific memory response, and did not reduce the amount of challenge virus shed or mortality after challenge. In summary, regardless of the delivery system, chIFN', when administered simultaneously with the vaccine antigen, did not enhance Newcastle disease virus vaccine immunogenicity.