PubAg

Main content area

Optimizing cotton irrigation and nitrogen management using a soil water balance model and in-season nitrogen applications

Author:
Zurweller, B.A., Rowland, D.L., Mulvaney, M.J., Tillman, B.L., Migliaccio, K., Wright, D., Erickson, J., Payton, P., Vellidis, G.
Source:
Agricultural water management 2019
ISSN:
0378-3774
Subject:
Gossypium hirsutum, acclimation, chlorophyll, cotton, environmental factors, field experimentation, harvest index, irrigation management, leaf area index, lint yield, models, nitrogen, physiological response, plant available water, production technology, sand, sandy loam soils, soil texture, soil water balance, weather, Florida
Abstract:
Nitrogen (N) and irrigation can be two of the costliest management inputs in United States (U.S.) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) production systems. Furthermore, input amounts are often dependent on yearly environmental conditions, making it challenging to optimize N and irrigation management. The objectives of this research were to determine optimal N and irrigation management by: (i) evaluating equally split in-season N rates applied at first square and bloom in combination with varying levels of plant available water replacement (PAWR) estimated by an ET-based soil water balance model for cotton; and (ii) evaluate the whole-plant responses to the interaction between N and water management levels. Field experiments were conducted during 2015 and 2016 at two locations in Florida (Jay and Citra), south-eastern U.S. with differing soil textures consisting of a deep sand and sandy loam. Irrigation treatments consisted of: (i) 100% of PAWR (100%); (ii) a primed acclimation (PA) treatment consisting of 50% of PAWR until first bloom and then 100% of PAWR (50%PA); (iii) 50% PAWR for the entire season (50%); (iv) a rain-fed control (RF). Nitrogen treatments consisted of even application splits at first square and bloom applied at a rate of 0 (N0), 22 (N22), 34 (N34), and 45 kg N ha-1 (N45). Lint yield assessments were conducted at both locations in both years. To link yield responses to possible physiological responses, in depth crop measurements consisting of SPAD chlorophyll content, leaf area index (LAI), N uptake, and harvest index (HI) were conducted at the Citra site. Contrasting soil textures and weather conditions between research locations and years allowed for a comprehensive assessment of both N and irrigation management across varying environmental conditions. Lint yield was either increased or at least maintained during the two years of this research at the Citra location by making two split N applications at first square and bloom of N22; while the optimal N treatment at the Jay location was N34 at first square and bloom in both years of this research. Additionally, a yield reduction occurred in the dry year of 2016 at the Citra location when N45 was applied at first square and bloom. The most efficient irrigation strategy at the Citra location was the primed acclimation treatment. At the Jay location, the RF control had similar lint yields as the irrigated treatments in both years, indicating that water application was not limiting at this site. These management strategies offer ways to optimize costly inputs when growing cotton in the southeastern U.S.
Agid:
6291823