PubAg

Main content area

The SER Standards, cultural ecosystems, and the nature‐culture nexus—a reply to Evans and Davis

Author:
McDonald, Tein, Aronson, James, Eisenberg, Cristina, Gann, George D., Dixon, Kingsley W., Hallett, James G.
Source:
Restoration ecology 2019 v.27 no.2 pp. 243-246
ISSN:
1061-2971
Subject:
ecological restoration, ecosystems, humans, models
Abstract:
Evans and Davis claim the SER Standards use a “pure naturalness” model for restoration baselines and exclude most cultural ecosystems from the ecological restoration paradigm. The SER Standards do neither. The SER Standards consider both “natural” ecosystems (that are unequivocally not cultural) and “similar” cultural ecosystems as suitable reference models. Furthermore, Evans and Davis propose assessing whether a cultural ecosystem exhibits “good, bad, or neutral impacts from humans on ecosystems” as the basis for reference models. We argue that such an approach would overlook the indispensability of native ecosystem benchmarks to measure human impacts and provide a springboard for social‐ecological restoration.
Agid:
6324201