Jump to Main Content
In situ soil pipeflow experiments on contrasting streambank soils
- Midgley, T. L., Fox, G. A., Wilson, G. V., Felice, R. M., Heeren, D. M.
- Transactions of the ASABE 2013 v.56 no.2 pp. 479
- erodibility, macropores, models, sediments, shear stress, soil water, steady flow, streams, Mississippi, Oklahoma
- Soil piping has been attributed as a potential mechanism of instability of embankments and streambanks. Limited field work has been conducted on quantifying and modeling pipeflow and internal erosion processes in the field with either natural or artificially created soil pipes. This research utilized an innovative constant-head trench system to conduct constant head soil pipe experiments in two contrasting streambanks: Dry Creek in northern Mississippi and Cow Creek in northern Oklahoma. Experiments included “open pipes” where the soil pipe was directly connected to the constant-head trench and open at the streambank face and “clogged pipes” which involved plugging the outlet of the soil pipe using soil excavated adjacent to the pipe. A tensiometer network was used to measure soil water pressures surrounding “open” and “clogged” pipe outlets on the streambank face. When pipeflow occurred, flow and sediment samples were collected using flow collection pans to quantify sediment concentrations and pipe enlargement. Flow and sediment data were used with an existing turbulent pipeflow and internal erosion model to estimate erodibility and critical shear stress properties of the soils, which were subsequently compared to similar properties derived from jet erosion tests. “Clogged” soil pipes resulted in pore water pressure increases in the soil adjacent to pipes, which generally remained below saturation during these experimental periods, except locations close to the plug. Depending on the density of the plugged soil material, the “clogged” soil pipes either burst resulting in turbulent pipeflow or were manually punctured to reestablish pipeflow. Calibrated erodibility and critical shear stress from the turbulent pipeflow and internal erosion model matched those observed from jet erosion tests for the less erodible soils on the Dry Creek streambank where sediment concentrations were consistently below 2 g/L even with fairly large hydraulic gradients on the pipe (0.3 m/m). For the more erodible streambank soils of Cow Creek, there is a need for improved pipeflow modeling that better accounts for pipeflow and soil matrix interactions leading to cases of steady flow rates but increased sediment concentrations during the initial stages of pipeflow.