Jump to Main Content
Reproductive responses to sexually active buck of does treated with melatonin when body weight/body condition is increasing or decreasing
- Gallego-Calvo, L., Gatica, M.C., Guzmán, J.L., Zarazaga, L.A.
- Animal reproduction science 2018 v.190 pp. 75-84
- analysis of variance, anestrus, blood glucose, blood sampling, body condition, body weight, bucks, energy, fatty acid composition, females, free fatty acids, insulin-like growth factor I, luteinizing hormone, male effect, melatonin, nutrition, ovulation, pastures, probability
- When the sexual activity of bucks is minimal, there is a minimal male effect on does regardless of their body weight (BW)/body condition (BC) and whether does are treated with melatonin or not. The study examines whether sexually active bucks can induce an adequate male effect in does with an increasing or decreasing trajectory of change in BW/BC when does are or not treated with melatonin. During natural anoestrus, 46 Blanca Andaluza does were assigned to two groups: 1) low BW/low BC group in which does were fed 1.9 times maintenance requirements for dietary energy for gaining BW/BC (LLg group; n = 23); or 2) a high BW/high BC group in which the does were fed 0.4 times maintenance requirements for dietary energy that resulted in a loss of BW/BC (HHl group; n = 23). There were similar numbers of does in each group that were treated or not treated with melatonin (MEL). Following 48 days of isolation from bucks, four sexually active individuals fitted with marking harnesses were transferred to the paddock containing the does of each group. Blood samples were collected by jugular venipuncture (before the distribution of concentrate) twice per week. The effect of the treatments (increasing or decreasing BW/BC and melatonin) on the different variables that were assessed were analysed using an ANOVA or the Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact probability test as necessary. During the 35 days after treatments were applied, the percentage of females expressing oestrous and having an ovulation were greater in the LLg + MEL than HHl-MEL subgroup (P < 0.05). The interaction of nutrition × melatonin treatment had a significant effect on reproduction of does (P < 0.05). This could be explained by the greater plasma glucose and IGF-1 and lesser plasma non-esterified fatty acid concentrations in does with increasing BW/BC (P < 0.01), and the greater IGF-1 concentrations of MEL-treated females (P < 0.01). The LH concentration and pulsatile release of this hormone from the pituitary were also modified by the presence of the males (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the LLg + MEL-treated does were responsive to the presence of bucks (P < 0.05). The present results indicate sexually active males cannot induce an adequate reproductive response in females with decreasing BW/BC even when does are being treated with melatonin. The presence of bucks enhanced the doe reproductive response when does were treated with melatonin and a pattern of increasing BW/BC.