PubAg

Main content area

Animal Welfare, Ideology, and Political Labels: Evidence from California’s Proposition 2 and Massachusetts’s Question 3

Author:
Bovay, John, Sumner, Daniel A.
Source:
Journal of agricultural and resource economics 2019 v.44 no.2 pp. 246-266
ISSN:
1068-5502
Subject:
animal housing, animal welfare, employment, income, laws and regulations, politics, California, Massachusetts
Abstract:
This article explains incentives that individuals face when deciding whether to support legislation on farm-animal treatment. We analyze precinct- and town-level voting patterns in two successful referendum votes (California’s Prop 2 and Massachusetts’s Question 3) that restricted animal-housing practices. In both cases, support for the referendum was positively correlated with support for the Democratic candidate for president and negatively correlated with employment in agriculture; support for Question 3 increased with income. We use our regression results to predict how voters in other U.S. states would have voted had they faced similar referendums in 2008 and 2016.
Agid:
6468659