Jump to Main Content
Phytomining to re-establish phosphorus-poor soil conditions for nature restoration on former agricultural land
- Schelfhout, Stephanie, De Schrijver, An, Vanhellemont, Margot, Vangansbeke, Pieter, Wasof, Safaa, Perring, Michael P, Haesaert, Geert, Verheyen, Kris, Mertens, Jan
- Plant and soil 2019 v.440 no.1-2 pp. 233-246
- agricultural land, bioavailability, biomass production, cutting, field experimentation, grasslands, hay, mowing, nitrogen, nutrients, phosphorus, potassium, soil, soil quality
- AIMS: To restore species-rich grasslands on former agricultural land, typically phosphorus-poor soil conditions need to be re-established. Here we assess the potential of phosphorus extraction by biomass production, i.e. phytomining. We compare two techniques: (i) ‘mowing’, i.e. cutting and removing hay two or three times a year, and (ii) ‘P-mining’, i.e. mowing with yield maximization by adding growth-limiting nutrients other than phosphorus (i.e. nitrogen and potassium). METHODS: In a five-year field experiment at three fields situated along a soil phosphorus gradient, we studied phosphorus removal through both biomass assessment and changes in two soil phosphorus pools: bioavailable phosphorus (POₗₛₑₙ) and slowly cycling phosphorus (POₓₐₗₐₜₑ). RESULTS: Phosphorus-mining doubled the phosphorus removal with biomass compared to mowing, and phosphorus removal with biomass was lower at fields with an initially lower concentration of POₗₛₑₙ in the soil. The POₗₛₑₙ concentrations decreased significantly during the experiment with the largest decreases in phosphorus-rich plots. Changes in the POₗₛₑₙ and POₓₐₗₐₜₑ stocks were correlated with the amount of phosphorus removed with biomass. CONCLUSIONS: Phosphorus-mining effectively increases phosphorus removal compared to mowing, but becomes less efficient with decreasing soil phosphorus concentrations. Restoring phosphorus-poor soil conditions on formerly fertilized land remains a challenge: phytomining most often needs a long-term commitment.