U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

PubAg

Main content area

Effect of phosphorus intake on faecal and non-faecal phosphorus excretion in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and the consequences for comparative phosphorus availability studies

Author:
Rodehutscord, M., Gregus, Z., Pfeffer, E.
Source:
Aquaculture 2000 no.3/4 pp. 383-398
ISSN:
0044-8486
Subject:
nutrient availability, Oncorhynchus mykiss, nutrient retention, body composition, liveweight gain, nutrient requirements, feed intake, feces composition, digestibility, phosphorus, digestible energy, excretion
Abstract:
The effect of dietary phosphorus (P) concentration on faecal and non-faecal P excretion of rainbow trout was studied with P concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 6.2 g/kg dry matter, the upper level calculated to be slightly above the P requirement. Eight semi-purified diets were prepared with varying proportions of dibasic sodium phosphate and an inorganic binder to achieve intended P concentrations. Diets were fed at a restricted rate to triplicate groups of trout initially weighing 51 g/fish for 43 days. P retention was determined by comparative whole body analysis. Faecal material was collected from a sedimentation unit attached to each tank and digestibility was determined using acid-insoluble ash as a marker. Non-faecal P excretion was calculated as the difference between intake of apparently absorbed P and retained P. Blood samples were taken at the end of the experiment. Responses of trout to increasing P intake were described by non-linear functions. Digestibility of lipid and carbohydrates and, consequently, energy were lower in fish fed the basal P level than in fish fed any supplementary level of P. The partial efficiency of digestible energy for retention, however, was not affected by the dietary P level. With increasing P intake, faecal P excretion increased non-linearly. Basal non-faecal P excretion was estimated at 3.7 mg/kg BW per day and was unaffected by P intake until the estimated P requirement was met. Above a P concentration of about 5 g/kg DM, non-faecal P excretion increased. Serum P(i) concentration remained unchanged once this dietary P level was achieved. It is concluded that trout adapt P absorption rate to increasing P intake already before the P requirement is met, whereas non-faecal P excretion happens when the supply of available P is sufficient for P retention. Marginal P absorption, determined as deltaP apparently absorbed/deltaP intake, showed a maximum of 0.73 at an intake level, which was approximately 33% of the estimated P requirement and dropped towards 0.40. Similarly but more pronounced, marginal efficiency of utilisation, determined as deltaP retained/deltaP intake, showed a maximum of 0.88 and tended towards 0.10 at high intake. Apparent absorption of P proved a suitable measure for comparative evaluation of P availability. However, for testing P availability, the concentration of available P in the diet should not exceed 2.5 g/kg DM. As a consequence, the difference method is necessary for routine studies on P availability in trout. This method implies that individual P sources are mixed with a low-P basal diet and that the availability is determined for both the basal diet and the mix, allowing for the calculation of availability for the test source as the difference.
Agid:
667682