PubAg

Main content area

Erosion processes in gullies modified by establishing grass hedges

Author:
Dabney, S.M., Shields, F.D. Jr., Temple, D.M., Langendoen, E.J.
Source:
Transactions of the ASAE 2004 v.47 no.5 pp. 1561
ISSN:
0001-2351
Subject:
gully erosion, erosion control, Panicum virgatum, planting, soil stabilization, Mississippi, Oklahoma
Abstract:
Concentrated flow can cause gully formation on sloping lands and in riparian zones of floodplains adjacent to incising stream channels. Current practice for riparian gully control involves blocking the gully with an earthen embankment and installing a pipe outlet. Measures involving native vegetation would be more attractive for habitat recovery and economic reasons. To test the hypothesis that switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) hedges planted at 0.5 m vertical intervals within a gully would control erosion, we established a series of hedges in several concentrated flow channels. Two of the channels were previously eroded trapezoidal channels cut into compacted fill in an outdoor laboratory. The other channels were located at the margin of floodplain fields adjacent to an incised stream channel (Little Topashaw Creek) in Chickasaw County, Mississippi. While vegetation was dormant following two growing seasons, we created artificial runoff events in our test gullies using synthetic trapezoidal-shaped hydrographs with peak discharge rates of approximately 0.03, 0.07, and 0.16 m3 s(-1), flow rates similar to those observed during natural runoff events in gullies at Topashaw. During these tests, we monitored flow depth, velocity, turbidity, and soil pore water pressures. Flow depths were generally <0.3 m, and flow velocities varied spatially and exceeded 2.0 m s(-1) at the steepest points in some tests. Erosion rates remained modest for the conditions tested, as long as slopes were less than 3 horizontal to 1 vertical (33%) and step height between hedges was less than 0.5 m. Stability modeling of soil steps reinforced with switchgrass roots showed that cohesive forces were 3 times greater than shearing forces for 0.5 m step heights, and that therefore mass failure was unlikely even with the surcharge weight of a 0.2 m depth of ponded water. For step heights greater than 1 m, however, mass failure was observed and predicted to be the dominant erosion mechanism.
Agid:
9720
Handle:
10113/9720